Workstation Performance - SPECworkstation 3.1

Publish date: 2024-08-10

SFF PCs traditionally do not lend themselves to workstation duties. However, a recent trend towards miniaturized workstations has been observed. While systems in the GEEKOM AS 6's form-factor are still not capable enough to become workstations, the rapid performance improvements over the years has encouraged us to benchmark some of these UCFF / SFF systems for content creation workloads and professional applications. Towards this, we processed the SPECworkstation 3.1 benchmark from SPEC.

The SPECworkstation 3.1 benchmark measures workstation performance based on a number of professional applications. It includes more than 140 tests based on 30 different workloads that exercise the CPU, graphics, I/O and memory hierarchy. These workloads fall into different categories.

Individual scores are generated for each test and a composite score for each category is calculated based on a reference machine (HP Z240 tower workstation using an Intel E3-1240 v5 CPU, an AMD Radeon Pro WX3100 GPU, 16GB of DDR4-2133, and a SanDisk 512GB SSD). Official benchmark results generated automatically by the benchmark itself are linked in the table below for the systems being compared.

Details of the tests in each category, as well as an overall comparison of the systems on a per-category basis are presented below.

Media and Entertainment

The Media and Entertainment category comprises of workloads from five distinct applications:

SPECworkstation 3.1 - Media and Entertainment

This category sees the Raptor Lake-P and Rembrandt systems getting ordered on the basis of the configured sustained TDP. The 4X4 BOX-7735U enjoys a lead with its 42W TDP, and the 40W RPL-P systems (including the Arena Canyon NUC) follow behind. The GEEKOM AS 6 with its 35W setting is in the middle of the pack, ahead of the previous generation systems.

Product Development

The Product Development category comprises of eight distinct workloads:

SPECworkstation 3.1 - Product Development

The trend observed in the Media and Entertainment category repeats here, with the 4X4 BOX-7735U faring better than the GEEKOM AS 6.

Life Sciences

The Life Sciences category comprises of four distinct test sets:

SPECworkstation 3.1 - Life Sciences

The addition of a GPU-centric component in the workload allows the GEEKOM AS 6 to leapfrog the RPL-P-based systems, but the 42W configuration of the Ryzen 7 7735U still remains on top.

Financial Services

The Financial Services workload set benchmarks the system for three popular algorithms used in the financial services industry - the Monte Carlo probability simulation for risk assessment and forecast modeling, the Black-Scholes pricing model, and the Binomial Options pricing model.

SPECworkstation 3 - Financial Services

While the 42W configuration of the 4X4 BOX-7735U continues to remain on top, some of the components in this workload are also better served with high single-threaded performance. We see the Arena Canyon NUC slotting into the second place, with the GEEKOM AS 6 slipping to third, and the TDP ordering being maintained.

Energy

The Energy category comprises of workloads simulating various algorithms used in the oil and gas industry:

SPECworkstation 3 - Energy

This workload also includes a GPU-centric component, and that helps the GEEKOM AS 6 and the other high TDP Rembrandt system come out in the top two (with the difference being in the realm of run-to-run variations). The high-performance RPL-P system (NUC BOX-1360P/D5) also delivers very similar performance.

General Operations

In the General Options category, the focus is on workloads from widely used applications in the workstation market:

SPECworkstation 3 - General Operations

The components in this workload benefit from single-threaded performance as well as high-performance storage subsystems. The SSD used in the Arena Canyon NUC, NUC BOX-1360P/D5, and 4X4 BOX-7735U use SSDs with DRAM for the FTL, while the GEEKOM AS 6 came pre-configured with a DRAM-less SSD for cost optimization. As a result, there is a significant gulf in the scores of the other systems and the GEEKOM AS 6, with the latter making an entry in the bottom half of the pack.

GPU Compute

In the GPU Compute category, the focus is on workloads taking advantage of the GPU compute capabilities using either OpenCL or CUDA, as applicable:

We only process the OpenCL variants of the benchmark, but the Intel iGPU drivers have an issue with the Caffe benchmark. All the Intel-based systems have a default 0.01 scoring for that component, and we see that reflected in their appearance in the bottom half of the graph below.

SPECworkstation 3 - GPU Compute

Within the Rembrandt-based systems, the 42W configuration of the Ryzen 7 7735U has the edge over the 35W Ryzen 9 6900HX in the GEEKOM AS 6, relegating it to the second place.

ncG1vNJzZmivp6x7orrAp5utnZOde6S7zGiqoaenZH55hZVtZqCdlaC8rnnArGRvZZGowrR5z6dsbGWimsOqsdZmqbKylaN6enmVcmdpoKhivaKvyqxkqa2emLWmv4yipWaZXaWytbXTnmSpmZOgrqixjm8%3D